INFLUENCE OF TEACHERS’ INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN SAMETA SUB-COUNTY, KISII COUNTY, KENYA

  • Julius Ndigwa Onyango Mount Kenya University
  • Simon Nyakwara Mount Kenya University
Keywords: Classroom, management, instruction, practices

Abstract

There has been a concerted effort by the government to improve students’ academic performance in secondary schools. Thus, the purpose of the study was to determine the influence of teachers’ instructional and classroom management practices on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Sameta Sub-County, Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design, with a target population of 350 persons, this comprised of 21 Head teachers and 329 teachers. The sample size of 176 persons was determined using the Krejcie & Morgan table (1970). The researcher collected data using questionnaires and interview guides. The instruments were validated by the supervisors. Reliability of the instruments was determined through a pilot study where Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r) was analyzed for the two scores and found to be 0.78, thus, the instruments were reliable. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and presented in tables, while, qualitative data was analyzed using the common themes, qualitative data extracted, organized and then discussed under the main objective areas of the study. The study established that there is a statistical significant association between teachers’ instructional and classroom management practices and students’ academic performance. It was therefore recommended that head teachers, administration, policy makers and other stakeholders should consider incorporating teachers’ efficacy on various practices such as teacher’s instructional, classroom management, motivation and interpersonal relationships, as this will enhance secondary school students’ performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amstrong, M. &Eslex, J. (2005). Classroom Engagement mediates the effects of teacher-student support on elementary students’ peer acceptance.

Baber, M. (2007). How the world’s Best Performing Schools come out on Top. London Mckinsey.

Baeza, Chester field and Moreno (2011).Basic Education strengthening Project. Project Evaluation Report for USAIDA Suarez and Associates.

Bandura, A. (Ed), (1997).Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control: New York: W.H. Freeman.

Bennel, P. & Akyeampong, K, (2007).Teacher Motivation in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Department for International Development.

Bennett, N. (1988). The effective primary school teacher: The search for a theory of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1): 190-30.

Brophy, J. E. (1988). Educating teachers about managing classrooms and students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1): 1-18.

Cheng (2004). Wash back in language testing: Research context and methods.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2000). Research methods in education.London: Routledge.

Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B. & Metcalf, K. K. (2003).The act of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Davis, I. K. (1973). Styles and effectiveness in education and training: A model for organizing teaching and learning. International Science, (Amsterdam) pp. 45-82.

De Vos, A. S., (2002). Research at the crossroads, Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Ferguson, R. F. (2003). Teacher perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460-507.

Gay, L.R. (1992). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Gibson, S. &Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.

Goddard, R. D.; Hoy, W. K.; & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its Meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.

Goodwin, B. (2010/2011). Research says: Good teachers may not fit the mold. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 79-80.

Gordon, L. M. (2001). High teacher efficacy as a marker of teacher effectiveness in the domain of classroom management. San Diego, CA. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the California Council on Teacher Education, (Fall 2001).

Henderson, A.T. & Mapp,K.L. (2002). A new wave of evidence. The impact of schools, family and community connections on student achievement annual synthesis,

Henderson,A.T. & Berla,N. (1994). Parent-school communication in the inclusive classroom. A comprehensive model of collaboration in education.

Henson, R. K. (2001, January). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Presented at the annual meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, Texas A & M University.

Kathuri, N. J., & Pals, A., D., (1993). Introduction to Educational Research.Nakuru: Egerton University: Education Book Series

Komba, W. &Nkumbi.E. (2008). Teacher professional development inTanzania: Perceptions and practices. Journal of international cooperation in Education vol. II No. 3 67-88.

Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W., (1970).Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

Kriesler,P. (1996). The general theory: Volume 2 overview, extensions, methods and new developments.

Kvale, S. (1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Leithwood, K. &Jantzis, D, (2000). Transformational school leadership for large scale: Effects on student, teachers and their classroom practices.Ontario institute for studies in education university of Toronto. Toronto.

Lichtman, (2010).Understanding and evaluating qualitative research SAGE publisher, California.

McComb, B. (1997). The learner centred classroom and school.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and behaviors: What really matters? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 3-15.

Ololube.(2006). Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness, university of Helsinki Finland.

Pianta, E. (1999). Teacher–student relationships and engagement; conceptualizing, measuring and improving the capacity of classroom interactions.

Polland, R. J., (2005). Essentials of Education Research and Analysis: Methods for determining sample size. http://www.unf.edu/dept/cirt/workshops/survey /Poland Manual.pdf

Skinner,B.F. & Belmont,S. (1993). Motivation in the classroom.

Sumra,S. (2006).Teaching in Tension: International Pedagogies, National Policies and Teachers practices in Tanzania.

Tan O. S., Parsons, Hinson and Sardo-Brown (2003). Educational psychology: Practitioner – researcher approach, Thomson.

Tartwijk, J. V., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (1998). Student perceptions of teacher interpersonal style: The front of the classroom as the teacher’s stage. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(6): 607-617.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A. and Hoy, W.K., (1998).Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.

Velma, G., &Mallick, K. (1999).Researching education: Perspectives and techniques, London: Falmer Press.

Walorop,K. (2006). Visionaries in our midst – ordinary people who are changing our world.

Woolfolk Hoy, A., &Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the earlyyears of teaching: a comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356.

World Development Report (2004). Making services work for poor people. World Bank.

Wubbels (2004).The Enterprise of education.

Wubbels, T. & Levy, J. (eds.) (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London, England: Falmer Press.

Published
2020-02-27
How to Cite
, J. N. O., & Simon Nyakwara. (2020). INFLUENCE OF TEACHERS’ INSTRUCTIONAL AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN SAMETA SUB-COUNTY, KISII COUNTY, KENYA. IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(2), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.53555/sshr.v5i2.3478