Primary Caesarian Section in El-Obeid Town, West of Sudan

  • Maruod E.Maruod
  • Dr. Khidir Elamin Awadalla MD
  • Dr. Rawaa Kamal Abdellatif MD
  • Prof. Abdelsalam Gerais MD,
Keywords: : Primary caesarian section, incidence, indications, outcome, Sudan

Abstract

The name caesarian section or caesarian delivery, means surgical removal of a fetus from the uterus, through abdominal and uterine incisions, following the completion of 28 weeks of pregnancy.  It is called primary caesarian section when it is done for the first time. Though caesarian delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality compared to vaginal birth. The Objectives of the study were to review current incidence, indications and outcome of primary caesarian section. To calculate incidence of primary caesarian section in El-Obeid , West of Sudan. To analyze indications for primary caesarian section and to evaluate the fetal and maternal outcome following the operation. The methodology was a prospective descriptive hospital-based  study, conducted  in  El-Obeid Town among pregnant ladies undergoing primary caesarian section in the main four Hospitals, which are El-Obeid Maternity Hospital, Police Hospital , Kordofan  Specialized Hospital  and  El-Obeid  Military  Hospital. The study involved all pregnant ladies booked for primary caesarian section in the four hospitals during the period first of July to 31st December 2013.The results showed that the number of cases who had a primary C/S were  612. Total number of life -birth deliveries were 4212 and incidence of primary C/S was 14.5 %. The  indication were  failure to progress 269 cases (43.9%) ,  fetal distress 98 cases (16%) , breech presentation 72 cases (11.8%) , pre-eclampsia /eclampsia 50 cases (8.2%) ,  abnormal lie and  presentation 40 cases (6.6%) , flailed induction of labor 35 cases (5.7%) , antepartum hemorrhage 34 cases (5.6%) , maternal request 7 cases (1.1%) ,and other indications 7 cases (1.1%). Three hundreds of the cases were primiparae .The operation was an elective procedure in 362 cases (59.15%) .  Spinal anesthesia was used  in 576  cases  (94.1%) , general anesthesia in 32  and only 4 cases with local infiltration .  Average hospital stay was 3.5± 2.1 days. Neonatal adverse outcome was encountered in 55 of the deliveries (9.0%). Maternal morbidity occurred in 50 cases (8.2 %).Conclusion: The study provided important data which can help in formulation of

Recommendations to reduce the rate of primary C/S as well as morbidities. The main maternal complications were found to be postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis, while fetal complications were found to be poor Apgar score, still birth, preterm labour and CMF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. H. Todman: Eduardo Porro (1842 – 1902) and the Development of Caesarean Section: A Reappraisal. The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2007 Volume 7 Number 2.

Storer HR, Successful removal of the uterus and both ovaries by abdominal section;the tumour, fibro-cystic, weighing thirty-seven pounds. AmJMedSci1866; 51:110-139.

Eleanor Capeless, Dana P Damron. Cesarean delivery. c2007 UpToDate R

Hofmeyr GJ, Barrett JF, Crowther CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006553. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006553.pub2.

Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ 2007;176:455–60.

Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, Breart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:541–8.

Abenhaim HA, Azoulay L, Kramer MS, Leduc L. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:49.e1–49.e8

Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012;29:7–18.

Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1226–32.

Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned

National Institutes of Health state-of-the science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27–29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107:1386–1397.

Nielsen TF, Hokegard KH. Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:911–916.

Francome C, Savage W, Churchill H, Lewison H. Caesarean Birth in Britain.

London: Middlesex University Press; 1993.

Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal and Maternal Medicine

Review. 2001; 12:23–39.

World Health Organization (2012) World Health Statistics. Geneva,

Switzerland:World Health Organization (WHO).

Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, et al. (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr

Perinat Epidemiol 21: 98–113.

Published
2018-07-31
How to Cite
E.Maruod, M., Awadalla MD, D. K. E., Abdellatif MD, D. R. K., & Gerais MD, P. A. (2018). Primary Caesarian Section in El-Obeid Town, West of Sudan. IJRDO -JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND NURSING, 3(7), 07-11. https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v3i7.2167

Most read articles by the same author(s)