Vol 5 No 3 (2019): IJRDO - Journal of Business management | ISSN: 2455-6661

Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image and Identity

Amity University, Patna
Published April 9, 2019
  • CSR,
  • Corporate Image,
  • Stakeholders,
  • Credibility
How to Cite
CHOUDHARY, A. (2019). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image and Identity. IJRDO - Journal of Business Management (ISSN: 2455-6661), 5(3), 85-89. Retrieved from https://ijrdo.org/index.php/bm/article/view/2784


The current article is a conceptual work exploring the potential impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate image and identity globally. The findings reveal that CSR has a strong and positive impact on company image as it creates a positive image of the organisation in the minds of the stakeholders including employees, suppliers, partners, shareholders, local communities among others. The findings also bring to light that CSR adds value to the organisation by reducing the cost and risk of doing business, adds to the reputation of the companies, harnesses greater competitive advantage, and creates a win-win situation for all stakeholders. The results may have important implications for multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in developing countries, development agencies including the United Nations (UN), UNCTAD and researchers working in the field of CSR, stakeholder management, brand management, etc.  


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Allen, J., & Root, J. (2004, September 7). The new brand tax. Wall Street Journal, B2.
  2. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct.
  3. Business
  4. and Society, 38, pp. 268–295.
  5. Carroll, A.B. & Shabana, K.M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility:
  6. A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management. Reviews,
  7. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x, pp. 85-105.
  8. Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions.
  9. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, September.
  10. Frynas, J.G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Critical
  11. Assessment Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 274-281.
  12. Keller, Kevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Consumer- Based
  13. Brand
  14. Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1-10.
  15. Kurucz, E., Colbert, B. and Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social
  16. responsibility. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. (eds), The
  17. Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social ResponsibilityOxford University Press, pp. 83–112.
  18. Levy, Reynold (1999), Give and Take, Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Lodge, G.C. (2006), Multinational Corporations: A Key to Global Poverty Reduction – Part 1.
  20. Polonsky, M.J. & Jevons, C. (2006). Understanding Issue Complexity When Building a Socially
  21. Responsible Brand, European business review, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 340- 349.
  22. Sen, Sankar and C.B. Bhattacharya (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better?
  23. Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38
  24. (2) 225-243
  25. Werther, W.B & Chandler, D. (2005).Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand
  26. insurance.Business Horizons (2005) 48, 317—324
  27. Zadek, S. (2000). Doing Good and Doing Well: Making the Business Case for
  28. CorporateCitizenship. Research Report 1282-00-RR. New York: The Conference Board.