FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STUDENTS SWITCHING BEHAVIOUR IN THE PURCHASE OF SMART PHONE

  • V. Vasigar
  • Dr. V. Velmurugan
Keywords: Switching Behaviour, Product, Brand, Price, Promotion, Peer Groups, Internet

Abstract

Switching behaviour is referred to the times when consumer chooses a competing choice rather than the previously purchased choice on the next purchase occasion. This research made an attempt to identity the factors influencing the students switch over the smart phone in the Pondicherry State. Smart phone product feature, pricing, promotion peer group, brand and internet factors are considered as the influencing factors for switch over behaviour of students in the purchase of smart phone. Descriptive research is applied. For collecting the primary data, questionnaire method survey was employed. By using convenience sampling technique, 152 students were surveyed. Correlation and regression analysis were applied to know the influencing factor. It is found that brand, promotion and pricing factors are influenced the students to switch over the smart phone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

V. Vasigar

Research Scholar,
Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University,Chidambaram. 608002

Dr. V. Velmurugan

Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration,
Annamalai University,Chidambaram. 608002

References

Chinomona, R., Okoumba, L., andPooe, D. (2013). The Impact of Product Quality on Perceived Value, Trust and Students’ Intention to Purchase Electronic Gadgets. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 4(14), 463.
Dziwornu, R. K. (2013). Factors Affecting Mobile Phone Purchase in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: A Binary Logit Model Approach . International Journal of Marketing Studies, 154-155.
Eisdorfer A., Hsu P.H. (2011). Innovate to survive: The effect of technology competition on corporate bankruptcy. Presented at CICF Conference, Singapore.
Eisdorfer A., Hsu P.H. (2011). Innovate to survive: The effect of technology competition on corporate bankruptcy. Presented at CICF Conference, Singapore.
Entner, R. (2010) Smartphones to overtake feature phones in u.s. by 2011 [Online] Available: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/smartphones-to-overtake-feature-phones- in-u-s-by-2011 [Accessed: 2 December, 2013].
Forsythe, S., Kwon, W. S., Leone, R. P., and Shannon, D. (2009). National Textile Center: Annual Report the Pivotal Role of Brand Image in Purchase Decisions.72-79.
Glasscock N. F., Wogalter M.S. (2006). Evaluating preferences for mobile phone features. Presented at Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, Raleigh North Carolina.
Joo, Young-Hyuck, Jong-Jun Jun, and Byung-Do Kim (2002). Encouraging consumers to pay less for mobile telecommunication services.Journal of Database Management, 9(4), 350.
Kaeveney, Susan M. (1995). Consumer Switching Behaviour in service Industries: An Exploratory study.Journal of Marketing, 59, 71-82.
Karjaluoto, H., Karvonen, J., Pakola, J., Pietilä, M., Salo, J. and Svento, R. (2003). Exploring consumer motives in mobile phone industry: An investigation of Finnish Kotler, P and Armstrong G. (2007). Principles of Marketing (12th edition.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Kotler, P and Armstrong G. (2007). Principles of Marketing (12th edition.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Mazursky David, LaBarbera Priscilla and Al Aiello. (2012). When Consumers Switch Brands. Psychology & Marketing, 4, 17-30.
Mittal, B and Lassar, W. M. (1998). Why do customers switch,the dynamics of satisfaction versus loyalty. The Journal of Services Marketing. 12(3), 177-194.
NagpalChapra, D. (2014). Factors Affecting Purchase Behaviour of women grocery consumer-An Insight. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research. 3(6).
Pike T. (2011). How Smartphone Technology affects Society. (Unpublished dissertation). University of Plymouth, Plymouth.[Online Forum Comment]. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2005/techtalk50-
Reisenwitz T.H., Iyer R. (2009). Differences in generation X and
Generation Y: Implications for the organization and marketers. The Marketing Management Journal. 19(2), 91-103.
Solayappan, A.N. and Jothi Jayakrishnan (2010). Customer Preference for Branded Computers with Special Reference to Post Graduate Student, Petroleum – Gas University Ploiesti Bulletin, Economic Science Series, 62(1).
Vetrivel, V., Solayappan A.N. and Jothi Jayakrishnan (2015). Brand Performance on Customer Based Brand Equity in Television Market, IJAR, 1(8), 717-721.
Published
2018-03-31
How to Cite
Vasigar, V., & Velmurugan, D. V. (2018). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE STUDENTS SWITCHING BEHAVIOUR IN THE PURCHASE OF SMART PHONE. IJRDO - Journal of Business Management, 4(3), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.53555/bm.v4i3.1933