Are individuals a problem for British structural-functionalist anthropology?

  • Terence Rajivan Edward
Keywords: individuals, structural-functionalism, biological needs, role occupants, identity


In this paper, I consider the objection to British structural-functionalism that it is unable to deal with the significance of individuals. There are various ways in which individuals may pose a problem for it. I identify four ways, one of which is novel. This way is when someone does not appear to meet the official role requirements in an organization, which gives rise to the question  of whether the anthropologist should posit an alternative structure of roles for the organization.


Download data is not yet available.


Haslanger, S. 2022. Failures of Methodological Individualism: The Materiality of Social Systems. Journal of Social Philosophy 53: 512-534.
Jarvie, I.C. 1967 (revised edition). The Revolution in Anthropology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Malinowski, B. 1960 (originally 1944). A Scientific Theory of Culture And Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Strathern, M. 1990. Review of Renato Rosaldo, Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. History of the Human Sciences 3: 310-313.
How to Cite
Edward, T. R. (2023). Are individuals a problem for British structural-functionalist anthropology?. IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 9(8), 106-108.