Post-Truth Thinking: A Critical View
Abstract
The objective of this article is the critical analysis of the thought associated with the idea of the "post-truth era" from a Marxist perspective, considering economic, political, and ideological factors. The study was carried out through the inductive and deductive and historical-logical methods, expressed in the systematization of texts. The fundamental result was the identification of the epistemological gaps of the subject, which allowed to advance in the critique of the studied phenomenon. The central conclusion is that post-truth is a phenomenon with an absence of rigor and integrity, ideologically biased by supporters of deception, who respond to business models associated with manipulation, in a political context, in which the truth is defined from the predominant power relations of the international financial oligarchy. With the proliferation of thinking about the "post-truth era", an attempt is being made to build a mentally immobilized global society, an aspect based on the assumptions of the fourth generation war, which has as its axis the transnational monopoly power, economically, politically and ideologically. What we are dealing with is the manipulation of psychological factors that ignotize human consciousness, using the electronic-informatics revolution.
Downloads
References
[1] Alves, M. (2020). The Natural Fallacy in a Post-Truth era. A perspective on the natural sciences’ permeability to values. EMBO Rep. 2020 Feb 5; 21 (2): e49859. Science & Society, Science & Society. https://doi: 10.15252/embr.201949859.
[2] Lei Ma, Zhongqiu Zhang, Nana Zhang (2018). Ethical Dilemma of Artificial Intelligence and its Research Progress. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 392 (2018) 062188 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062188. Northwestern Polytechnical
University Mingde College. Available at:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/0621 88/pdf.
[3] Aharonian, Aram. (2018) ¿Enfrentar la guerra de quinta generación con arcos y flechas? Available at: http://www.cubadebate.cu/autor/aram-aharonian/.
[4] Amorós García, Marc (2018). Fake News: La verdad de las noticias falsas. 1st Edición, Edición Kindle, Plataforma Editorial; Edición: ISBN-13: 978-8417114725. España.
[5] Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1970). La Era Tecnotrónica. Editorial Paidós, Buenos Aires. Argentina.
[6] Chesney, R. and Citron, D. (2018). Keats, Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security (July 14, 2018). 107 California Law Review (2019,
Forthcoming); U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 692; U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-21. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3213954 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954.
[7] Chesney R. y Citron, D. (2019). Deepfakes and the New Disinformation War. The Coming Age of Post-Truth
Geopolitics. Available at:
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-12-11/dee pfakes-and-new-disinformation-war.
[8] Oliver, M. (2020). Infrastructure and the Post-Truth Era: is Trump Twitter’s Fault?. Postdigit Sci Educ2, 17–38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00073-8.
[9] Guareschi, Pedrinho (2018). Psicologia e Pós-Verdade: a Emergência da Subjetividade Digital. PSI UNISC, Santa Cruz do Sul, v. 2, n. 2, jul./dez. 2018. ISSN: 2527-1288.
[10] Sánchez Vázquez, G. (1996). La utopía del fin de la utopía. Revista Internacional. Marx Ahora. No. 1, 1996. La Habana, Cuba.
[11] Murolo, L. (2019). La posverdad es mentira. Un aporte ceonceptual sobre periodismo y fake news. En R. Aparici y D. García-Marín (Eds.), La posverdad. Una cartografía de los medios, las redes y la política. Barcelona: Gedisa.
[12] Del-Fresno-García, M. (2019). “Desórdenes informativos: sobreexpuestos e infrainformados en la era de la posverdad”. El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 3, e280302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.02.
[13] Hernández-Santaolalla, V. et al, (2019). Postverdad y discurso intimidatorio en Twitter durante el referéndum catalán del 1-O.
Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, (2019), 102-121. 1646-5954/ERC123483/2019. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial Generic (cc by-nc). Available at: http://obs.obercom.pt.
[14] Sebastián, C. et al, (2018). “Infomediación y posverdad: el papel de las bibliotecas”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, eISSN: 1699-2407.
[15] Mercier, Arnaud. (2018). Fake news et post-vérité: 20 textes pour comprendre la menace. The Conversation, France, 2018. hal-01819233. HAL Id: hal-01819233. Available at: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01819233/document.
[16] González, M. F. (2017). La posverdad en el plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Nueva Sociedad, 269.
[17] Corner, John (2017). “Fake news, post-truth and media– political change”. Media, culture & society, v. 39, n. 7, pp. 1100-1107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726743.
[18] Niño González, J. A. et al, (2017). Opinión pública e infoxicación en las redes: los fundamentos de la post-verdad [Public opinion and infoxication in the networks: fundamentals of post-truth] Vivat Academia, revista de Comunicación, 139, 83-94 doi: 10.15178/va.2017.139.83-94. Available at: http://www.vivatacademia.net/index.php/vivat/article/view/1083
.
[19] FUNDÉU BBVA (17 de noviembre 2016). Posverdad, mejor que post-verdad. Fundeu.es. Available at:: https://www.fundeu.es/recomendacion/post-truth-post-verdadposverdad.
[20] Jeffery, T. (2016). Britain Needs More Democracy After the EU Referendum, Not Less. The Huffington Post. Available at: www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tomjeffery/britain-needs-more-dem ocr_b_10699898.html.
[21] Oxford Dictionaries (2016). “Word of the year 2016 is ‘post-truth’”. English Oxford Living Dictionaries. Available at:
https://goo.gl/Ua86Nw.
[22] Roberts, D. (2010). Post-truth politics. Available at: https://grist.org/article/2010-03-30-post-truth-politics.
[23] Keyes, Ralph (2004). The post-Truth era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York, S. Martín Press.
[24] Alterman, E. (2004). When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences. New York: Penguin Books.
[25] Steve Tesich, (1992). The Watergate Syndrome: A Government of lies, The Nation.
[26] Flood, A. (2016). Post-truth' named word of the year by Oxford
Dictionaries. The Guardian. Available at: www.theguardian.com/books/2016/nov/15/post-truth-namedword-of-theyear-by-oxford-dictionaries.
[27] Verzi Rangel, A. (2019). Una guerra de Quinta Generación, ¿en vías de fracaso? CLAE / Rebelión. Available at:
http://estrategia.la/2019/02/19/venezuela-una-guerra-de-quinta -generacion-en-vias-del-fracaso/.
[28] Sadín, Eric, (2017). Lecturas sobre futuro del trabajo. Adaptado de reportajes en 2017. Disponible en www.relats.org.
[29] Freytas, Manuel. (2009). Guerra de Cuarta Generación.
Available at:
http://www.iarnoticias.com/secciones_2006/norteamerica/001 9_guerra_cuarta_generacion_21mar06.html.
[30] Benedicto Salmerón, R. (2011). Teorías y conceptos para entender formas actuales de hacer la guerra Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
[31] Empresas más grandes del mundo (2019). Según su capitalización bursátil en bolsa (lo que costaría comprarlas). 21 febrero, 2019. Available at:
file:///F:/best%20global%20digital%20world%20places/Empr esas%20m%C3%A1s%20grandes%20del%20mundo%20201 9%20%20%20Economipedia.htm.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
