Morphological and Syntactic Behaviour of Lubukusu Locative Clitics among Native Speakers of Bungoma County, Kenya

  • Nyongesa Sharon Nelly Mounty Kenya University
  • David Wafula Lwangale Mounty Kenya University
Keywords: clitics, Lubukusu, communication, locative

Abstract

This study examined how Lubukusu, a Bantu dialect of Luluhyia language in Bungoma County has locative clitics and their impact in communication. The study aimed at establishing the effects of Lubukusu   locative clitics in communication among the native speakers of Lubukusu in Bungoma County by looking at the morphological and syntactic behavior of Lubukusu clitics.  This study employed the Stratal Optimality Theory by Anderson (2005) where he describes the phonological behavior of clitics. This study relied on the pre-existing   data and adopted a qualitative research approach by use of   descriptive research design. The target populations were the native speakers of Lubukusu from Bungoma County. The study employed simple random sampling   and   probability   sampling   techniques   so   that   each    respondent had an equal chance of being selected   fairly.   The   study used qualitative   data   collection   methods   by   use   of    interview schedule. Interview schedule were used because the researcher did not want to limit the respondents on the use of Lubukusu locative clitics. The qualitative data were analyzed by descriptive and content analysis to get information. The   researcher ensured   that   while   carrying   out   this   study, the   confidentiality of   the   respondents was adhered to. The study found out that Lubukusu locative clitics had morphological properties that were reconciled with their syntactic properties and phonological properties in order to aid in communication within a sentence structure. These findings implied that Lubukusu locative clitics have properties that were peculiar and that can be interpreted by assuming that they become part of the adjacent words at the phonological level but they are independent elements at the syntactic level of analysis. That is why they both were and were not words.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AndersonJ.M(1973)Structuralaspects of languagechange ,Longman . London .
Angogo,R.M.(1983)UnityinDiversity: AlinguisticsurveyofAbaluhyaofWesternKenya, Nairobi, AfroPublishers
Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A Morphous Morphology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, .M. (2003), Agreement, dislocation and partial configurationality. In, A. Harley, H. Willie, M (Eds), Formal Approaches to Functions PP. 107-134
Baker.M (2008). The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bowers, J. (2002). Transitivity, Linguistic Inquiry 33, 183-224
Bresnan, J. Kanerva, J. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa; A case Study of Factorization of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1), 1-50
De Blois &Frans.K (1975) Bukusu Generative Phonology and Aspects of Bantu Structure.
Inkelas, Sharon (1990). Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. New York. Garland.
Kinyalolo, Kisangati, 1991. Syntactic Dependencies And The Spec-Head Agreement Hypothesis in Kilega. PhD Dissertation, UCLA.
Kiparsky, Poul (2000). Paradigm Effects and Opacity. Ms Stanford University.
Klavans, Judith, L. 1985. The Independence of Syntax and Phonology in cliticisation. Language 61, 195-120
Koopman, Hilda 2000. The Styntax of Spefiers and Heads. London, Routledge.
Kothari, C.R (2004) Research Methods & Technologies; New Delhi New Age International Publishers
Makila, FE (1978) An Outline of Bukusu of Western Kenya. Nairobi Kenya Literature Bureau
Marlo, Michael, Adrian Sifuna and AggreyWasike, 2008.Lubukusu English Dictionary
Marlo, Michael. 2009. Luyia Tonal Dialectology. Talk Given At The University of Nairobi, December 16,
Mchombo Sam. 2004. The Syntax of Chichewa.Cambridge University Press.
Meeussen, A.E 1967. Bantu Grammatical Reconstructions. Africana Linguistica. 3:79-122
Monachesi, Paola (1999). A Lexical Approach to Italian Clitilization, Stanford: CSLI Publications
Mugena, O, M & Mugenda, A,G (2003) Research Methods. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Nairobi , Act Press
Mutonyi. N (2000) Aspects of Bukusu Morphology and Phonology
Nilep, C (2006) Colorado Research in Linguistics; University of Colorado, Boulder
Rivas, A. (1977) A Theory of Clitics, PhD Dissertation. MIT
Ross, John, 1967. Constraints on variables in Syntax, PhD dissertation,MIT
Selkirk, E. (1984) Rhonology and Syntax. Cambridge. Mass. MIT Press.
Sikuku Justine. Anaphora in Lubukusu, PhD dissertation University of Nairobi.
WasikeAggrey. 2002. On The Lack of True Negative Imparatives in Lubukusu and Other Bantu Languages. PhD. Dissertation, Cornell University.
Were G.S (1967) A History of the Abaluyia of Western Kenya; C 1500-1930. Nairobi, Kenya. East African Publishing.
Zubizarretta, Maria Luisa. 1999. The Clitic Projection in Questions. In Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona. The Catalan Working Papers: 253-277
Zwart, C. Jan Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. Dordvecht. Kluwer
Zwicky, A. (1977 ) On Clitics
Published
2020-09-04
How to Cite
Nyongesa Sharon Nelly, & David Wafula Lwangale. (2020). Morphological and Syntactic Behaviour of Lubukusu Locative Clitics among Native Speakers of Bungoma County, Kenya. IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(8), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.53555/sshr.v5i8.3797