SIRIH AS A SYMBOL OF VERBAL AND NON VERBAL MESSAGES IN ACEH COMMUNITIES
Abstract
This present study seeks to examine communication based on “sirih” as the symbol related to the message contained verbally and non-verbally appears and develops in the city of Banda Aceh. The targets studied are the essence, function and meaning of the symbols contained in the message as communication media in the phenomenon of social and cultural life. This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach that is packaged in phenomenology. This approach, seeing that phenomena must be carried out and understood holistically, prioritizes process over outcome. Obtained results showed that “sirih” into a community tradition has reflected a variety of symbols from the messenger by ignoring the meaning of the recipient of the message, especially in the meaning of betel in various official ceremonies and in daily life as traditions and customary traditions that become the inculcation of values and norms carried out and trusted and believed can bring blessings in human life in social life, although not all people are able to understand and interpret the message contained therein.
Downloads
References
[2] T. M. Freeberg, K. E. Gentry, K. E. Sieving, and J. R. Lucas, “SPECIAL ISSUE : UNASKED QUESTIONS On understanding the nature and evolution of social cognition : a need for the study of communication SPECIAL ISSUE : UNASKED QUESTIONS,” Anim. Behav., vol. 155, pp. 279–286, 2019.
[3] L. Morgan, A. Delehanty, J. Cleary, C. Schatschneider, and A. M. Wetherby, “Early Childhood Research Quarterly Measures of early social communication and vocabulary production to predict language outcomes at two and three years in late-talking toddlers,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 51, pp. 366–378, 2020.
[4] O. Papakyriakopoulos, J. Carlos, M. Serrano, and S. Hegelich, “Political communication on social media : A tale of hyperactive users and bias in recommender systems,” vol. 15, 2020.
[5] X. Wu, C. Feng, Z. He, X. Gong, Y. Luo, and Y. Luo, “Hormones and Behavior Gender-speci fi c e ff ects of vasopressin on human social communication : An ERP study,” vol. 113, no. April, pp. 85–94, 2019.
[6] R. Rui, R. M. Davison, C. Xiaojuan, I. Systems, K. Tong, and H. Kong, “International Journal of Information Management A symbolic interactionism perspective of using social media for personal and business communication,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 51, no. October 2019, p. 102022, 2020.
[7] L. Marschner, S. Pannasch, J. Schulz, and S. Graupner, “Social communication with virtual agents : The effects of body and gaze direction on attention and emotional responding in human observers,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 85–92, 2015.
[8] R. Huerta-álvarez, J. J. Cambra-fierro, and M. Fuentes-blasco, “Journal of Destination Marketing & Management The interplay between social media communication , brand equity and brand engagement in tourist destinations : An analysis in an emerging economy,” J. Destin. Mark. Manag., vol. 16, no. February, p. 100413, 2020.
[9] K. Chandra, S. Hasan, A. Mohaimin, and M. Cebrian, “Understanding the e ffi ciency of social media based crisis communication during hurricane Sandy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 52, no. August 2018, p. 102060, 2020.
[10] R. Thompson, S. Gupta, K. Miller, S. Mills, and S. Orr, “The effects of vasopressin on human facial responses related to social communication,” vol. 29, pp. 35–48, 2004.
[11] N. Rigney, “Hormones and Behavior Sex di ff erences in vasopressin 1a receptor regulation of social communication within the lateral habenula and dorsal raphe of mice,” Horm. Behav., vol. 121, no. February, p. 104715, 2020.
[12] C. Grüter and T. J. Czaczkes, “SPECIAL ISSUE : COGNITION & LANGUAGE Communication in social insects and how it is shaped by individual experience SPECIAL ISSUE : COGNITION & LANGUAGE,” Anim. Behav., vol. 151, pp. 207–215, 2019.
[13] R. E. Jack and P. G. Schyns, “Review The Human Face as a Dynamic Tool for Social Communication,” Curr. Biol., vol. 25, no. 14, pp. R621–R634, 2015.
[14] C. Plessis, “Social media crisis communication : Enhancing a discourse of renewal through dialogic content,” Public Relat. Rev., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 829–838, 2018.
[15] S. Chu, H. Chen, and C. Gan, “Consumers ’ engagement with corporate social responsibility ( CSR ) communication in social media : Evidence from China and the United States ☆,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 110, no. February, pp. 260–271, 2020.
[16] J. Oh and E. Ki, “Factors a ff ecting social presence and word-of-mouth in corporate social responsibility communication : Tone of voice , message framing , and online medium type,” Public Relat. Rev., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 319–331, 2019.
[17] J. Maliszewski, E. N. Lewandowski, B. Speck, C. Desjonqu, and R. L. Rodríguez, “Social ontogeny in the communication system of an insect,” vol. 148, 2019.
[18] Y. Wan and A. Ri, “Computers in Human Behavior The moderating role of communication contexts : How do media synchronicity and behavioral characteristics of mobile messenger applications affect social intimacy and fatigue ?,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 97, no. February, pp. 179–192, 2019.
Copyright (c) 2020 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
