ANALYSING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MONEY MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL INTERACTION OF THE HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL BOYS
- Money Management, Students’ Performance, Social Interaction, Discipline
Copyright (c) 2019 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Discipline is one of the most effective factors in learning process. In the modern educational plans, the main purpose of discipline is to create the educational environment and opportunities for learning process. Indeed, discipline is an instrument for realizing the high educational goals that leads to the students’ growth and progress in every dimension. In order to this, the student will acquire a level of self-discipline and self-control. The main objective of this study is to examine the significant relationship between money management and social interaction factors of self discipline. It basically used the descriptive research design in carrying out the study and in selecting the respondents, random sampling were undertaken to 63 students in Government Higher Secondary school Handwara in rural District Kupwara of Jammu & Kashmir state, India. The structured questionnaires were used to gather the information Data were analyzed using statistical tools such as frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, regression and correlation. Findings of the study revealed that 100% were boys under the age group of 16 years. Majority of boy’s father’s occupation was employee and 84.1 per cent of the mother’s functioning as house wife/home maker. Mean responses of money management and social interaction showed that there was no significant difference between money management and social interaction of the students. Money management and social interaction showed a positive no significant correlation at 1% level. Both self discipline factors have an impact on students’ discipline behavior at school with 0.001 where the results were not statistically significant 1% level. This may be due to money management and social interactions among the students, whom cannot able to manage the money spending for their personnel factors and cannot, have social assessment between family and friends. This can be interpreted that as the money management and social interaction factors were related together for a student’s activity at school and home. Interestingly, the studying hours which are used to be a predictor of students’ academic performance is found to have no relationship to academic performance that can also be interpreted that, regardless of whether the student spent short or long time with their studies, the results might be the same.
• Akers,R.L Self-Control as a general theory of crime, Journal of Quantitative Criminology,Vol.7, no.2, pp. 201-211, 1991.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Carlson, S.M. and Moses,L.J., Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind, Child Development, vol.72, pp.1032-1053, 2001.
• Cochran,J., Wood,P., Sellers,C. and Chamlin,M, An Empirical Test of a General Theory of Crime, Deviant Behavior,Vol.19 ,pp.227-255, 1995.
• Corsini,R. Encyclopedia of Psychology, 2nd edition, Vol. 1 , USA , John Wiley and Sons,1994.
• Cotton, K. (2006). School wide and Classroom Discipline. Educational Time Factors. [On-line]: Available URL: http://www.nwrel.org/archive/sirs/5/cu9.html.
• Creenchan,E.(1995): A Test of a General Theory of Crime, Csraborough, Canada , Printice Hall, Inc
• Davis,H.L. and Pratt,C, The development of children’s theory of mind: The working memory explanation. Special Issue: Cognitive development, Australian Journal of Psychology, vol.47, no(1), pp. 25-31, 1995.
• De Ridder, D. T., Lensvel-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, F., Stock, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review,16(1), 76-99.
• Du paul, J. and Hoff, Reducing disruptive behavior in general education classrooms: The use of self-management strategies, School Psychology Review, Vol.27, no.2, pp.290-344, 1998.
• Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 16(12), 939-944. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
• Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind Leaves Behind: The role of IQ and selfcontrol in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(2), 439-451.
• Dunham, V. (1984). Stress in Teaching. London, Croom Helm.
• Epstein, R. Skinner as a Self-Manager, Journal Of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol.30, no.3, pp.545-568, 1997.
• Fox,N. and Calkins,S The development of self-control of Emotion, Motivation and Emotion, Vol.27, no.1, pp.7-26 , 2003.
• Gaustad, J. (1992). Schools Respond to Gangs and Violence. OSSC Bulletin. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon School Study Council.
• Gibbs,J.,Giever,D. and Martin,J. Parental Management and Self-control, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 35, pp.40-70 ,1998.
• Goldfried, M. R., & Merbaum, M. (1973). A perspective on self-control. Behavior change through self-control, 3-34.
• Goldstein,P.A. Student Aggression: Prevention, Management, and Replacement Training, New York, Guilford Press , 1994.
• Gottfredson, M. R. and Hirschi, T. A general theory of crime, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1990.
• Hudley,C Problem Behavior in Middle Childhood : Understanding Risk Status and Protective Factors, California, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational research Association, p.37 ,1999.
• Karoly,P, Mechanisms of self-regulation : A system view , Annual Review of Psychology, vol.44,pp.23- 52,1993.
• Keenan,T, The role of working memory and inhibitory control in children’s understanding of false belief. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1999.
• La Grang, T. and Silverman, R, Low Self-control and Opportunity: Testing the General Theory of crime as an E planation for Gender Differences in delinquency, Crimionology, Vol.37,pp.41-72, 1999.
• Longshore, D. Self-control and criminal opportunity, Social problems, Vol.45, pp.102-113, 1998.
• Marion,M Helping children deal with Anger, Young Children, Vol.52 , no. 7, pp.62-67,1997.
• Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693-2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108
• Ngonyani, D. J., Muhairwa, A. G. and Mmari, E. D. (1973). “The Nature, Causes and Treatment of Disciplinary Problems in Dar-es-Salaam Educational Institutions”. A Class Project Report. Dar-es Salaam.
• Richardson,K, Developmental Psychology – How nature the nurture interact, London, Macmillan press LTD , 2000.
• Sami Abdul qwey, Psychophysiology, 2nd edition, Cairo: Egyptian Renaissance Library, 1995.
• Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-322.
• Taylor,A.F., Frances,E.K and Sullivan,W.C. Views of Nature and Self-Discipline, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 21, pp.1-15, 2001.
• Thompson,R. and Calkins,S.), The double-edge sword: Emotion regulation for children at risk, Development and Psychopathology, Vol.8, pp.163-182, 1996.
• Weinberg,M., Katherine,T., and Oslon,L. Gender differences in emotional expressivity and self-regulation during early infancy, Developmental Psychology, Vol.35, no(1), pp.175-188, 1990.
• Wood,P., Bfefferbaum,P. and Arneklev,P, Risk taking and Self-control: Social psychological correlates of Delinquency, Journal of Crime and Justice, vol.16, pp.111-130, 1993.
• Zettler, I. (2011). Self-control and academic performance: Two field studies on university citizenship behavior and counterproductive academic behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 119-123. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.002
• Zimmerman,B.J.(2000): Attaining self-regulated learning : a social cognitive perspective, San Diego, Academic Press.