The role of Dissemination of Monitoring and Evaluation Results in the promotion of Performance of Digital Education Technology Project In Malawi

  • Symon Manyenje Winiko University of Nairobi
Keywords: Dissemination of M&E results, Project Performance, Digital Education Technology


The study aimed to investigate the influence of Dissemination of Monitoring and Evaluation Results on the performance of Digital Education Technology (DET) project in Malawi. Methodologically the study was guided by descriptive survey correlational design. The target population was comprised of 456 persons who were involved in the management, implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation of the DET project. 204 respondents were sampled using proportionate stratified random sampling approach to ensure that all categories of respondents were represented in the sample. A table of random numbers was used to sample participants from each stratum. Questionnaire and interview guide were utilized as data collection instruments. These instruments were piloted to enhance validity and reliability. Quantitative data analysis was done using SPSS and both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques were used. Frequency, mean and standard deviation were utilized as descriptive statistics while Pearson product moment correlational coefficient and regression analysis were used as inferential statistical tests. The qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis and this involved the identification of recurrent themes from the voices of the participants. With r=0.367, r2=0.135, F (1, 183) =28.309 at p=0.001<0.05 the study has established that Dissemination of Monitoring and Evaluation results has a moderate positive influence on performance of DET project in Malawi. The study recommends the strengthening of Dissemination of M&E results in order to improve the performance of DET project.


Download data is not yet available.


Adamchak, S., Bond, K., MacLaren, L., Magnani , R & Nelson, K.(2000). A guide to Monitoring and Evaluating Adolescent Reproductive Health Programmes, Washington DC.
Asian Development Bank (2011). Improving project Success through Effective Communication and Participation. document/35013/files/ll-communications.pdf.
Badir, Y., Buchel, B., & Tucci, C.(2012). A Conceptual Framework of the Impact of NPD project team and leader empowerment on communication and performance. An Alliance Case Context, International Journal of Project Management, 30(2012), 914-926.
Brodbeck, F.(2001). Communication and Performance In Software Development Projects, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(1), 73-94.
Bryman, A. (2008). Introduction to Social Research Methods, SAGE Publications, London.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Retrieved from
Hobson, K., Mayne, R.,& Hamilton, J.(2013). A Step by Step Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation,
Kyalo, K.,Mulwa, A.,& Nyonje, R. (2015). Monitoring and Evaluation of Projects and Programs, A handbook for Students and Practitioners, Aura Publishers, Nairobi.
Mertens, D,.& Wilson T (2012). Program Evaluation Theory and Practice, A comprehensive guide, The Guilford Press, New York.
Muszynska, K. (2015). Communication Management in Project Teams (Practices and Patterns): Paper Presented at Management, Knowledge and Learning Joint International Conference 2015, Bari, Italy.
Richardson, J.T.E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education30, no. 4: 387–415
Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Qulaity (2011). Assessing the Learning Achievement of Standard 6 Pupils.
Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Qulaity (2017). Assessing the Learning Achievement of Standard 6 Pupils.
Umhlaba Development Services (2017) Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation Using the Logical Framework Approach, Johannesburg.
United Nation Development Program (2009) Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results, New York.