Meta- Evaluation of Instruction of Classroom in University

  • Kai Li Feixian School, Linyi University, Feixian, China
  • Hongchun Sun School of Mathematics and Statistics, Linyi University, Linyi, China
Keywords: educational evaluation, meta-evaluation, teaching


Teaching evaluation is an important part of teaching work and an important means of scientific management in the field of teaching. Reasonable implementation of teaching evaluation activities is an effective guarantee for improving teaching quality. The meta- evaluation of teaching is to evaluate and study the quality and conclusion of teaching evaluation technology according to certain theoretical and value criteria. The meta-evaluation of teaching evaluation is to standardize the research of teaching evaluation, monitor the teaching evaluation activities, reduce the deviation, smoothly realize the evaluation purpose, better play the function of teaching evaluation, and obtain good evaluation benefits.


Download data is not yet available.


[1] Y. Zhou, J. Du, “On problems of PE teaching evaluation,” Sports Science Research, 3: pp. 90-92. Sep., 2007.
[2] H. Z. Jin, “Research on the Meta-Evaluation of PE Teaching Evaluation and Its Quantification Analysis Model,” Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 5: pp. 436-437. Sep., 2006.
[3] Q . Han, W. Z. Miao, “The study on the reform of evaluation methods of PE teaching in universities,” Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education, 5: pp. 81-83. Sep., 2005.
[4] V. Gremeaux, M. Gayda, R. Lepers, et al., “Exercise and longevity,” Maturitas,73(4), pp.312-317. Dec., 2012.
[5] S.Yli-Piipari, E.Leskinen, T. Jaakkola, et al., “Predictive role of physical education motivation: the developmental trajectories of physical activity during grades 7-9,” Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 83(4), pp. 560, Feb., 2012.
[6] X .Chi, S. T. Hawk, S. Winter, et al., “The effect of comprehensive sexual education program on sexual health knowledge and sexual attitude among college students in southwest china,” Asia-Pacific journal of public health / Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health, 27(2), pp. 2049-66. Feb., 2015.
[7] J.W. Wang, Z.Y. Li, H.Y. Li, et al., “Exploration and Demonstration Research on the Scientific and Technological Innovative Evaluation Method for Research Institutes of Traditional Chinese Medicine,” 5: pp. 755-760. May, 2016.
[8] Y. N. Wu, C. Liu, M. Naren, et al., “Based on the Fuzzy Multi-Objective People Decision Method of Engineering Bidding Evaluation”. Advanced Materials Research, 671-674(1), pp. 3147-3151. Mar., 2013.
[9] Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, “Evaluation of teaching quality of public physical education in colleges based on the fuzzy evaluation Theory,” Journal of Computational & Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(12), pp. 9848-9851. Dec., 2016.
[10] B. Mullen, “Strength and immediacy of sources: A meta-analytic evaluation of the forgotten elements of social impact theory,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48(6), pp.1458-1466. Jun., 1985.
[11] H. Yurdugul, “Minimum sample size for Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: A Monte-Carlo Study,” Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(35), pp. 397-405. Jan., 2008.
[12] D. Coey, D. Coey, “Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems: the role of test-control interference,” Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. ACM, pp.567-582. Jun., 2014.