IJRDO - Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering employs a peer review system that guarantees the quality, clarity, and technical accuracy of the manuscripts published. This aims to be beneficial to authors and ensure the quality of published research.

Initial Screening

The first step in the peer-review process is that the editorial team reviews the manuscript. This involves determining if:

• The topic is relevant to the journal
• The paper meets minimum submission and formatting requirements
• The manuscript is clear for review
• The manuscript is original and complete

At this point, the authors may be asked to make minor corrections, and the manuscript is then forwarded to reviewers.

Review by Subject Experts

The manuscript is then sent to subject experts for review. The manuscript is assessed by the reviewers in terms of:

• Technical accuracy and quality of work
• Clarity of writing and presentation
• Appropriateness to electrical and electronics engineering
• Appropriateness of methods, design, or analysis
• Validity of results and conclusions

Reviewers write comments and suggestions for the manuscript.

Type of Review

The journal operates under a typical peer review system where the details of reviewers are not publicly available. This ensures a professional and unbiased review.

Editorial Decision

The editorial board reviews the recommendations of the reviewers. The possible outcomes include:

• Acceptance of the manuscript
• Minor revision required
• Major revision required
• Rejection

The decision and comments help authors with any requested revisions.

Revision and Resubmission

In the case of a request for revision, authors must:

• Respond to all review comments
• Make relevant changes to the manuscript
• Include a response with justification

In some cases manuscripts may be returned to the reviewers.

Final Review and Acceptance

The manuscript is reviewed and finalised by the editorial board. Manuscripts must meet the requirements of the journal for acceptance.

Timeliness of the Process

The journal strives to have a timely review process. We strive to achieve a balance between avoiding undue delay and giving adequate consideration.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts and communications are kept confidential. Author and reviewer identities are kept confidential by the journal, and used only for the review process.

Our Approach

Our aim is to have a review process that is predictable, transparent and high quality. The aim is to help authors make their manuscripts better and to ensure that published articles are accurate, relevant, and helpful to the community.