The Role of Technology in Enhancing Student Engagement and Performance: A Case Study in Eswatini Secondary School Educational Settings
Abstract
The paper uses the case study approach to estimate the impact brought by technology on students’ engagement and academic performance. The quantitative data target was from 296 students and 48 teachers, including 25 Administrative/Support Staff and 10 observation Checklists across all secondary schools in Manzini Region of the kingdom of Eswatini. The research has employed correlation and regression methods to bring out the impacts that utilization of technological development and support bring on student engagement and performance. These findings depict the use of technology within a curriculum as greatly enhancing learners' engagement, hence academic performance. Recommendations at the end of the paper note that educators and policy makers should make use of technology in ways that enhance learning experiences.
Downloads
References
• Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U., 2020. The use of learning management systems to enhance student engagement in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), pp.143-156.
• Birimler, A., 2020. Easy Learning and Theory with Answers. [online] Available at: https://birimler.atauni.edu.tr/yabanci-diller-yuksekokulu/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2020/07/Easy-1-with-answers.pdf [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Cornell University, 2023. Collaborative learning. [online] Available at: https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/active-collaborative-learning/collaborative-learning [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Davenport Group, 2023. Interactive learning tools: A practical guide to integrating technology in the classroom. [online] Available at: https://davenportgroup.com/insights/interactive-learning-tools-a-practical-guide-to-integrating-technology-in-the-classroom/ [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Dede, C., 2010. Technologies That Transform How We Learn. In: J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown & R.R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, pp. 211-241.
• Education Week, 2023. Digital distractions in class linked to lower academic performance. [online] Available at: https://www.edweek.org/leadership/digital-distractions-in-class-linked-to-lower-academic-performance/2023/12 [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Elm Learning, 2023. Constructivism: A learning theory. [online] Available at: https://elmlearning.com/hub/learning-theories/constructivism/ [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Fullan, M., 2013. Stratosphere: Integrating Technology, Pedagogy, and Change Knowledge. Toronto: Pearson.
• Gao, N., Shao, W., Rahaman, M.S. & Salim, F.D., 2020. n-Gage: Predicting In-Class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(3), pp.562-573.
• Harvard University, 2023. Technology and student distraction. [online] Available at: https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/technology-and-student-distraction [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Jack, E., Alexander, C. & Jones, E.M., 2024. Levelling Up Learning: Exploring the Impact of Gamification in Flipped Classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), pp.345-367.
• Kim, K.J. & Bonk, C.J., 2006. The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says... EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(4), pp.22–30.
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L., 2016. Technology-enhanced learning: New directions in teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 95, pp.12-16.
• Kulik, J. A., 2018. The effects of using computer technology in education: A meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 47(2), pp.273-280.
• Laurillard, D., 2012. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
• Learning Experience Design, 2023. Constructivism learning theory in education. [online] Available at: https://lxdlearningexperiencedesign.com/learning-theory/constructivism-learning-theory/ [Accessed 19 December 2024].
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K., 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
• Piaget, J., 1972. The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
• Schlechty, P.C., 2011. Engaging Students: The Next Level of Working on the Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Salmon, G., 2013. E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
• Turan, Z., & Ustun, A. B., 2021. The effect of technology on student engagement and learning outcomes in educational settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), pp.1-
• Wen, W. & Walter, M., 2022. Examining the Impact of One-to-One Digital Technology Integration on Student Writing Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), pp.1234-1256.
• Wen, W. & Walter, M., 2022. Examining the Impact of One-to-One Digital Technology Integration on Student Writing Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), pp.1234-1256.
Copyright (c) 2024 IJRDO- Journal of Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
