THE IMPACT OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS M-LEARNING ON M-LEARNING ADOPTION: THE CASE OF THE PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN SAUDI ARABIA
The current study attempted to examine the relationship between attitudes towards m-learning and m-learning adoption in the higher educational context, specifically in the Saudi public universities. 381 lecturers who teach various subjects in these universities have constituted the sample of this study. The study employed a quantitative research design where a questionnaire was used as the tool for data collection which was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings of the study revealed that the construct of attitudes was positively and significantly related to m-learning adoption. The study concluded with a number of recommendations that could be implemented by educators and policy makers in Saudi Arabia.
Al-Adwan, A. & Smedley, J. K. (2012). “Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian Higher Education Systems: Factors affecting impact”. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8 (1), pp121-135.
Al-Debei, M.M., Al-Lozi, E.M., Al-Hujran, O. & Aloudat, A. (2014). 'Why “i-mode” mobile platform failed to succeed outside Japan: An analysis from a business model perspective', International Journal of Business Innovation and Research (IJBIR).
Bal, Y., & Arıcı, N. (2011). Mobil ögrenme materyali hazırlama süreci. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 4(1),7-12.
Balash, F., Yong, Z. & bin Abu, B. (2011). Lecturers and educational technology: Factors affecting educational technology adoption in teaching. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Management Technology. IPEDR, 13. IACSIT Press, Singapore
Bertea, P. (2009). Measuring students’ attitude towards e-learning: A case study. Proceedings of 5th International Scientific Conference on e-Learning and Software for Education, Bucharest, April 9th-10th.
Chaiklin, H. (2011). Attitudes, Behavior and Social Practice. Journal of Sociology& Social Welfare, March 2011, vol. xxxviii, no. 1.
Chanchary, F. H., & Islam, S. (2011). Mobile learning in Saudi Arabia - prospects and challenges Paper presented at the International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT'2011), Zarqa University, Jordan.
Chuttur M.Y., (2009), "Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments sand Future Directions," Indiana University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37). http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.
Davis, F. D, (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MISQuarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-339.
Frankel, J., & Wallen, N. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Fletcher, M. (2004). Roles in support of teaching and learning. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 304-313). Perth, 5-8 December.
Geller, E. S. (1992). Solving environmental problems: A behaviour change perspective. In S. Staub & P. Green (Eds.). Psychology and social responsibility: Facing global challenges (pp. 248-270). New York, NY: New York University Press.
Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2002). On the nature of attitude–behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 869–876.
Iqbal, S. & Qureshi, I. (2012). M-learning Adoption: A Perspective from a Developing Country. The International Review of Research Open and Distance Learning. 13 (3), 147-164.
Kaigin, B., & Basoglu, N. (2006). Adoption factors of mobile services. International Conference on Mobile Business, Copenhagen, p. 41.
Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256-270.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K. & Chang, R. (2008, December). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. Paper presented at the Ascilite 2008, Melbourne.
Lackey NR, Wingate, AL. (1998). The pilot study: one key to research success. In: Advanced design in nursing research, 2nd edn, (eds.) Brink PJ & Wood MJ. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
MacCallum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2009). Identifying discriminating variables that determine mobile learning adoption by educators: An initial study. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ASCILITE Auckland 2009. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/maccallum.pdf.
Mallat N, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK, Oorni, A. (2008). An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 12:57–65.
Odabaş, H. (2009). Mobile learning how the mobile library. UNAK 09, in the Information Age of Being: Opportunities and Threats, 01-02 October 2009, Yeditepe University, Istanbul.
Orr, G. 2010. A review of literature in mobile learning: Affordances and constraints. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education, 107–11. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Peng, H., Su, Y.-J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 46(2), 171–183.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants (Part I). From On the Horizon (NCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001). Available at http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky - Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants -Part1.pdf.
Rao, V. S. P. And Narayana, P. S. (1998), Organisation Theory and Behaviour, (Delhi: Konark Publishing Company), (329-330).
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Sarmad, M. (2013). Adaption of M-Learning as a Tool in Blended Learning- A Case Study in AOU Bahrain. International Journal of Science and Technology. ISSN 2224-3577.
Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H. and Rehman, O. M. H. (2013). Exploring Major Challenges and Benefits of M-learning Adoption. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 3(4): 826-839, 2013.
Schneider, D.J. (1988). Introduction to Social Psychology, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Smedley, J.K. (2010) Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight (2010) 23, pp 233–250. doi:10.1057/ori.2010.11
Tarımer, I., Şenli, S. & Doğan, E. (2010). Mobil iletişim cihazları İle ögrenim materyallerine.
Utulu, C.S, (2012).Use of mobile phones for project based learning by undergraduate students of Nigerian private Universities. International Journal of Education and Development using Information Communication and Technology. Vol. 8. No. 1 (2008). pp. 1 – 15.
Yun, G., & Murad, M. (2006). Factors influencing psychology and skills of the secondary school teachers’ e-learning readiness: A case study in Malacca, Malaysia. Fourth International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education (M-ICTE 2006). Retrieved August 31, 2012, from http://www.formatex.org/micte2006/pdf/2135-140.pdf.
Zhu, Guo, and Hu’s (2012), Mobile learning in higher education: Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning in three top Chinese universities. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis. Jonkoping Universities, Jonkoping.
Copyright (c) 2019 IJRDO - Journal of Educational Research (ISSN: 2456-2947)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.