Overlooked systems in S. Baron-Cohen’s gender research
The professor of psychopathology Simon Baron-Cohen claims that males are on average stronger at systematizing than empathizing and females are on average stronger at empathizing than systematizing. Systematizing is defined as the drive to construct or understand systems. In this paper, I observe that Baron-Cohen overlooks certain examples of systems, examples which lead to doubts about his claim.
Baron-Cohen, S. 2003. The essential difference: men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.
Baron-Cohen, S. 2009. Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156: 68-80.
Carroll, J. 2016. Laws of Nature. In E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/laws-of-nature/
Chang, H. 2007. The Myth of the Boiling Point. Accessed on 12th Feb. 2007 from:
Edward, T.R. 2018. The definition of systematizing in S. Baron-Cohen’s gender and autism research. Philosophical Pathways 219: 1-4.
Fine, C. 2010. Delusions of Gender: The Real Science Behind Sex Differences. London: Icon Books.
Kranz, K.C. and Long, B.C. 2002. Messages about Stress in Two North American Women’s Magazines: Helpful? We Think Not! Feminism and Psychology 12: 525-530.
Rodrigues, A.E., Hall, J.H. and Fincham, F.D. 2006. What Predicts Divorce and Relationship Dissolution? In M.A. Fine and J.H. Harvey, J.H. (eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship resolution. London: Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2019 IJRDO - Journal of Biological Science (ISSN: 2455-7676)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.