GOVERNMENTAL POWER CREATING SURVELLIENCE COUNTRY: EXCESSIVE OR ENOUGH
The question of the security of the State is always of a grave concern. As technology advances, there are new threats to the nation and this throws up new challenges before the State machinery. To combat these challenges, Section 69 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 was drafted. It provides the Government with the power to monitor decrypt or intercept any information in any computer resource. It also enables the Government to appoint certain agencies to car. The order of government is nothing but establishment of that country in which government tries to control every part of people’s lives which is nothing but making and set up of Orwellian society. Hence it may be concluded by this order that it’s not worth for the people to live in this country. We the people of India also want our country to be safe and secure but there should be some proper, just and fair procedural way to be followed by government. If central and state government agencies don’t stop their so called as lawful activity of interception or monitoring or decryption of information then this small word of seven letters ‘privacy’ going to cause disaster, fraud in the life of people. Thus government activity of securing country can lose the trust of their own citizens. The police is there in police station not in our house so why government want to be our relative for all the time out these functions.
)The Palakkad District ... vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 27 February, 2013 Kerala High Court - Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
) Rustomjee Kerawalla Foundation vs Avisha Gopalkrishnan Kulkarni on 29 August, 2012 Bombay High Court - Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
) Ace Matrix Solutions Ltd.,, Delhi vs Assessee on 13 February, 2012 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi - Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
) Ramkhilavan Sharma vs Smt. Ramkunwar Maheshwari on 12 February, 2014 State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission - Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
) Mariadassou Philomene Dominique vs The Member Secretary on 13 February, 2018 Madras High Court - Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
) The Choondacherry Service vs The Meenachil Rubber Marketing & on 28 May, 2015 Kerala High Court - Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
) Kagzi Jahanara Mohammadasif & vs State Of Gujarat on 17 June, 2015 Gujarat High Court - Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Copyright (c) 2019 IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (ISSN: 2456-2971)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJRDO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.