The Impact of Advising on Degree Completion and Student Retention

  • Jeff Stevens McNeese State University
  • Jiun-Shiu Chen McNeese State University
  • Mitch Adrian McNeese State Universit
Keywords: student retention, student graduation, student engagement, student turnover

Abstract

Graduation rates remain at low levels along with low retention rates and diminishing rates of students feeling connected to their school, which continue to be a major challenge for universities across the nation. This study will investigate the link to these factors and student sense of belonging as it relates to advisement at a university in southwest Louisiana with a student population of roughly 10,000 students. In many instances, advising has become-it-yourself” advising process that has plagued advising for some time for schools across the nation. When students are permitted to set up their own class schedule, several problems quickly emerge, which range from them selecting the wrong courses to selecting courses to fit time, not degree programs. The proliferation of online platforms creates a greater opportunity for students into a selfchecklist process, which increases problems related to self-advising, choppy advising and a greater potential for a disconnected student. The amount of time students spend with advisors are clear indicators of degree completion and the level of retention of students, which has long and short term benefits. Money is not the main reason students leave school as opposed to issues related to advisement and connection with the school, which are factors that can be addressed as will be illustrated in this paper. The main sections of this paper will be the foundational aspects of advising, the general advising atmosphere, student retention.

Author Biographies

Jeff Stevens, McNeese State University

PhD McNeese State University
Assistant Professor of Management
4205 Ryan Street
Lake Charles, LA 70605

Jiun-Shiu Chen, McNeese State University

PhD McNeese State University
Assistant Professor of Management
4205 Ryan Street
Lake Charles, LA 70605

Mitch Adrian, McNeese State Universit

PhD

References

AlKandari, N. (2012). Students’ communication and positive outcomes in college classrooms.
Education, 133(1), 19-30.
Allen, J.K. (2011). Teaching for civic engagement: Lesson learned from integrating positive
psychology and future studies. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(3),1-
15.
Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall, & J.
Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice (pp. 113-121).
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 43. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Chen, R. (2012). Institutional characteristics and college student dropout risks: A multilevel event
history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 487-505.
Creamer, E. G. (1994). Evaluating advising programs for undecided students. In V. N. Gordon
(Ed.), Issues in advising the undecided college student (pp. 109-122). (Monograph No. 15).
Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for The Freshman Year Experience, University of
South Carolina.
Creamer, E. G., & Scott, D. W. (2000). Assessing individual advisor effectiveness. In V.
N. Gordon, W. R. Habley, & Associates, Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook
(pp. 339-348). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cuseo, J. (2003). Assessment of academic advisors and academic advising programs. Retrieved
August 31, 2010, from http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Clearinghouse/Links/assessment.htm
Demetriou, C. (2005). Beyond Student Satisfaction Surveys: Designing a Student Focus Group to
Assess Academic Advising. The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal. Retrieved August
31, 2010, from http://www.psu.edu/dus/mentor/050211cd.htm
Ender, S. C. (1983). Assisting high academic-risk athletes: Recommendations for the academic
advisor. NACADA Journal (October), 1-10.
Frost, S. H. (1991). Academic advising for student success: A system of shared responsibility.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 3. The George Washington School of Education
and Human Development, Washington DC.
Gentry, R. (2007, September). It takes 2 to produce a quality teacher: A groovy student and a
harmonizing professor. Paper presented at the annual Reaching Out to Mississippi Education
in Action (ROMEA) conference, Cleveland, MS. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. ED498729).
Glennen, R. E., & Vowell, F. N. (1995). Selecting, training, rewarding, and recognizing faculty advisors (pp. 69-74). In M. L. Upcraft & G. L. Kramer (Eds.), First-year academic advising:
Patterns in the present, pathways to the future (pp. pp. 3-14). (Monograph No. 18). Columbia,
SC: National Resource Center for The Freshman Year Experience & Students in Transition,
University of South Carolina.
Habley, W. R. (2000). Current practices in academic advising. In V. N. Gordon, W. R. Habley, &
Associates, Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 35-43). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Hu, S. (2011). Reconsidering the relationship between student engagement and persistence in
college. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 97-106.
Hu, S., & Ma, Y. (2010). Mentoring and student persistence in college: A study of the Washington
State Achievers program. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 329-341.
Hu, S., McCormick, A.C., & Gonyea, R.M. (2012). Examining the relationship between student
learning and persistence. Innovative Higher Education, 37, 387-395.
Hurt, B. (2004). Using the balanced scorecard approach for program assessment of faculty
advising. NACADA Journal, 24(1 & 2), 124–127.
Lassibille, G., & Gomez, L.N. (2008). Why do higher education students drop out? Evidence from
Spain. Education Economics, 16(1), 89-105.
Light, R. (2004). Changing advising through assessment. NACADA Journal, 24(1 & 2), 7–16.
Mckinney, L., & Novak, H. (2013. The relationship between FAFSA filing and persistence among
first-year community college students. Community College Review, 41(1), 63-85.
Oja, M. (2012). Supplemental instruction improves grades but not persistence. College Student
Journal, 46(2), 344-349.
Rumberger, R.W. (2006). Why students drop out of school. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Dropouts in
America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 131-155). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Education Press.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.
Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
Titus, M.A. (2004). An examination of the influence of institutional context on student persistence
at 4-year colleges and universities: A multilevel approach. Research in Higher Education,
45(7), 673-699.
White, E. R. (2000). Developing mission, goals, and objectives for the advising program. In V. N.
Gordon, W. R. Habley, & Associates, Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook (pp.
180-191). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Winston, R. B., Miller, T. K., Ender, S. C., Grites, T. J., & Associates (1984). Developmental
academic advising. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Winston, R. B. Jr., Sandor, J. A. (2002). Evaluating Academic Advising: Manual for the Academic
Advising Inventory. Retrieved August 31, 2010, from
http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/clearinghouse/links/AAI-Manual-02.pdf
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED423806
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~oir/pdfs/DartmouthEnrolledStudentSurvey_2007_SatisfactionAdvisi
ng.pdf
Published
2018-01-31